About American Book 

    Our Mission

    Our Promise

    The Imprints

 

Author Information

    Manuscript Submission

   Instruction & Guidelines

 

Author Guide

     Author Introduction

    Book Production & Sales

    Working With Your Editor

 

Bookstore

    American Book Titles

    Available Here And At

    Bookstores Near You.

 

Comments About Us

     Comments From The

     Industry & Authors About

     American Book. 

 

Media Information

    Company Information

    Press Releases

    Review Book Requests

 

Articles 

    Over 100 Articles All

    Written By Our Very Own

    Authors & Editors!

 

Rights & Permissions

    Information for obtaining

    Subsidiary Rights & Use

    Permissions.

 

Writers Desktop

    Comprehensive List of

    Best Writer Resources   

    & business links.

 

Link To Us

    Instructions & Banners 

 

 

We Welcome Your Questions & Comments Please E-Mail Us Here

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

Writing About War

 

 

More books and novels have been written about war or use war as a background than any other human event. Why is this? Are we a warmongering society? Of course we are. We are humans and, unfortunately, humans make war. Some people say, "I don’t like to read war stories." I think that what they are really saying is that they don’t like war, a sentiment that any sane person would agree with. Like the song says, "War… what is it good for? Absolutely nothin’." 

Except as a theatre of human emotion and storytelling, war is a complete waste of time, lives and energy. Talk to any veteran of war and he will tell you that there is no glory in killing others. Yet that same veteran might also tell you that never in his life did he feel more intensely alive, in an extreme environment where body or mind may be destroyed at any moment, with the feeling that they depended upon their fellow soldiers and cared about their comrades more than they could have imagined during peacetime. And this is why I think there are so many books on the subject or books that have war as a background. Because of the intensity of human emotion and striving that takes place in a war environment, an environment of conflict on the greatest scale.

I hate war too. The very idea that because one government declares war on another and gives its citizens not only the right but the obligation to murder the other, is repugnant to me. And yet my fictional books are about a group of men and boys going to sea in a sailing warship during the American Revolution. I am more interested in the sailing of a ship and the lives and characters on that ship than I am about the war, but the fact that a world conflict is going on gives that ship and those characters a purpose, a challenge and an intensely dangerous backdrop in which to interact that makes the story more interesting, both from an historical vantage as well as from the human dimension. The same person who says, "I don’t like war stories" will not think twice about going to one of those scream movies or watching a documentary about a serial murderer. Why? Because of the extreme and intense emotions that one will experience while waiting for that sweet young girl to be horribly murdered—the kind of emotions and scenes that I would rather avoid, finding a good war story preferable for the simple reason that the war story is usually not about simple fear and the gruesome act of killing, but about normal people in dire and quite abnormal circumstances. Murder is a terrible thing too, but it makes for an interesting story.

What about the argument that war stories are inherently culturally biased? I worked as a psychiatric social worker overseas on a U. S. Army base for five years. Some of my friends were from the German community and I enjoyed inviting them to go with me to the movies at the base after a dinner of typically American fare such as barbequed chicken wings or pizza. After a showing of Rocketman, a fanciful story of a young American hero type who finds a secret device that he can strap on his back and zoom around the county, my German friends seemed to be unusually silent. Of course the story takes place during WWII and the young man finds himself flying against the Nazis. My German friends were upset at the fact that, once again, as in Raiders of the Lost Ark, German soldiers were the bad guys. I was probably being insensitive to their complaint when I said, "Well, you have to admit, the Nazis make great bad guys. They’re obviously evil and besides, their flags and uniforms are so colorful." 

My mother is German, so I felt I could say such things, but I don’t think I endeared myself to my German friends with those words. The same thing happened with the "inscrutable Chinese" and the Indians, all portrayed as "bad guys." I suppose some of this can be viewed as inherently racist, but if one views a movie like Rocketman or Raiders, almost cartoon-like stories, the portrayal of Nazis is not so much a racist or anti-cultural statement as it is a simple foil for an exciting movie, using an image that people associate with evil to portray, if not completely believable, at least recognizable "bad guys." I knew that my German friends were glad that Hitler lost the war, that he was a real "bad guy," and that they certainly did not think of themselves as Nazis. They did not argue with me about the fact that Nazis, as a group, were "obviously evil," but Nazis were also Germans and so there are things about peoples and cultures that can never be adequately explained. Perhaps to my friends, the association was difficult to overcome and all I can say is that such portrayals must be written with sensitivity to the "other" side without glossing over the truth.

In any war story one side is against the other. In my books, the Colonies are against the British. Not because the British are bad, but because that is what happened in history. The characters that play the British are not inherently bad, but the side they are on, from my characters’ view, is the wrong one. Comments about the other side are naturally uncomplimentary. But I also try to show that the other side is human, not evil; that they suffer as much as the Americans; that they only happen to be on the other side through accident of birth, not because they are on the wrong side. My hero, although he must defeat his enemies, feels human emotions, feels some compassion for the men on both sides who must suffer. One British captain is chivalrous enough to give his prisoners free roam about his ship, inviting my heroes to dinner—even going against specific orders by keeping a man out of the prison ship, sending him to a British hospital instead, thereby saving the life of my gunnery officer and showing that even the enemy is not without compassion. In writing about war, both sides are ultimately human beings, cast into their roles by fate, not by right or wrong choices, each equally capable of honorable or evil acts. One does not choose sides in war. And that is what I would encourage the reader who says "I don’t like war stories" to try and understand. It is not war or hatred of another race that a writer is glorifying, but it is the human beings he is writing about, and often the people on both sides. War stories are almost always about human beings, not about war.

Michael Winston is the author of Independent Action.

© 2005 American Book Publishing™ *All other trademarks used by permission. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Trademarke Policy.